To this end, in the theoretical chapter, we considered the phenomenon of dialogic speech, its characteristic features and differences frоm monological speech, and also studied the factors that affect the flow of the communication process. Taking into account these factors and the peculiarities of dialogue as a form of communication is necessary when studying the units of dialogic speech-utterances. When analyzing the concept of utterance, as well as various approaches to its study, we focused on the communicative-semantic theory of utterance, developed by L. P. Chakhoyan.
In the course of the work performed, the results of scientists ' research in the field of grammar, language stylistics, translation theory and other linguistic disciplines were considered, as well as the analysis of the short stories by Somerset Maugham was carried out. As a result of the conducted research, it was found that there are a number of regularities in the dialogic speech of a literary text. First of all, we are talking about a violation of the norms of the codified language, which is explained by the author's desire to create the effect of unpreparedness of the character's speech in an informal communication situation.
In dialogue, preference is usually given to simple syntactic constructions and, therefore, this feature of oral speech is reflected in the stylization of it. Thus, another characteristic feature of dialogic speech in a literary text is the ellipticity of syntactic structures. However, we should not forget about the important difference between written and oral dialogue, which is a higher degree of explicitness of the first. This phenomenon is explained by the fact that in written communication there is no possibility of transmitting meaning by non-verbal means.
Further, the translator should take into account the fact that the syntactic structure of individual utterances of the dialogue is influenced by such factors as the general rhythm of a prose work, the peculiarities of the literary type, genre, as well as the art direction to which the literary text belongs. In addition, the dependence of the syntactic design of dialogic speech (the preference for certain typical conversational structures, the degree of informality of the replicas, the stereotypical or original manner of expressing the thoughts of the characters) on the individual author's style is obvious. Finally, when translating a literary text, it is necessary to remember the subordination of the particular to the whole. Thus, the syntactic structure of dialogic speech corresponds to the main function of the text, the prevailing mood, the features of the composition, and other general factors.
Based on the comparative analysis of the original texts and the completed translation, conclusions were drawn about the typicality and uniqueness of the transformations used and the reasons for this relationship. Thus, the most characteristic syntactic transformations for this text are substitution and permutation. A particularly typical transformation is the rearrangement of the circumstance, since the difference in the thematic structure of the utterance in the source and the translating languages is fundamental and, therefore, manifests itself quite often. Among the grammatical substitutions, first of all, it is necessary to distinguish a complex functional replacement, as well as the replacement of a passive construction with an active one.
This situation is caused by the fact that the use of the passive voice is very common in English dialogue, while in Russian colloquial speech, passive constructions are not frequent. Unique transformations for this text are the permutation of the main members of the sentence, the permutation of the non-personal forms of the verb, the nominal part of the composite predicate, and the replacement of the uniоn type of connection with the non-uniоn one. In general, the permutation of a simple sentence in a complex sentence and other syntactic substitutions in complex sentences are atypical transformations for this translation, since the subject of the analysis was dialogic speech, which is not characterized by cumbersome syntactic constructions.
In conclusion, it should be noted that literary translation is of interest not only as a subject of research, but, above all, as a creative process of recreating aesthetic values. Transcending linguistic and ideological boundaries, the translator is an indispensable intermediary in the global process of cultural exchange and mutual enrichment of peoples.
25 страниц
92% уникальность
2021 год
31 просмотров
